View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 273 | WADF | Core | public | 30 Sep 2009 11:52 | 19 Oct 2009 13:52 |
| Reporter | timj | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Target Version | 0.13.2 | Fixed in Version | 0.13.2 | ||
| Summary | 273: Use "svn up" in conjunction with "svn sw" when deploying SVN dependencies | ||||
| Description | In older versions of SVN, the switch syntax "svn sw X@Y" does not exist; the nearest is "-r". But in newer versions of SVN where it does, "svn sw -rX Y" is not the same as "svn sw X@Y" The solution is to use "svn up -r X" if the URL is the same. Probably better to use --force too. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Sep 2009 11:52 | timj | New Issue | |
| 2 Oct 2009 10:25 | timj | Target Version | => 0.13.2 |
| 5 Oct 2009 21:42 | timj | Note Added: 283 | |
| 5 Oct 2009 21:42 | timj | Status | new => resolved |
| 5 Oct 2009 21:42 | timj | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 5 Oct 2009 21:42 | timj | Fixed in Version | => 0.13.2 |
| 5 Oct 2009 21:42 | timj | Summary | Use "svn up" instead of "svn sw" for working copies from the same path => Use "svn up" in conjunction with "svn sw" when deploying SVN dependencies |
| 19 Oct 2009 13:52 | timj | Status | resolved => closed |
